An outlying theme on the Compact is its democratic attributes. The Compact emphasizes equal laws and fairness throughout. Also, another theme in the compact is its religious aspects, as the authors of it proclaim the glory of God, and have deep foundations of their beliefs contained in Christianity.
How does the Mayflower Compact reflect an attachment to both the "Old" and "New" worlds?
It reflects the Old World, as they are very attached to their king, being loyal to him, and staying religious with their Christianity. But, the Compact reflects the new world, with its emphasis on equality, and a government with its people's approval.
How did the fundamental orders of Connecticut differ from the Mayflower Compact?
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut is an evolved version of the Mayflower Compact. While the Compact is just an agreement between the colonists for cooperation and prosperity, the Fundamental Orders takes the next step up and specifies positions of power in government, and what powers these positions have.
What prompted the colonists of Connecticut to take this approach to government, i.e.: use of a written constitution?
The colonists wanted to protect the river towns, and to deter persecution of certain groups, hoping that the fundamental orders would protect each everyone's individual rights.
In what significant way(s) does the Fundamental Orders reflect a fear of and safeguard against the usurping of power by one person or a chosen few?
The Orders limits the power of its political positions, having an early form of checks and balances. For example, the Governor is not allowed to hold his position for more than two years.
Reminds me of U.S. Constitution, having similar democratic elements of the other two documents. |
What the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut look like |
The signing of the Mayflower Compact |
No comments:
Post a Comment